全影像大小可產生APS-C大小影像的鏡頭只屬數碼屬性,它們不可使用於比APS-C 格式更大的影像接收器,也不適用於菲林相機。 超聲波自動對焦一般來說,超聲波對焦鏡頭比傳統對焦鏡頭靜和快。 使用了一個或更多的低散光度鏡頭元素低散光度鏡頭元素能減低彩色的色差。 不穩定影像穩定器能減低手震時產生的模糊影像,特別在長焦距或陰暗情況下。根據倒數的定律,影像穩定化比無影像穩定鏡頭能有1到3個光圈優點。 金屬接腳平價鏡頭通常會使用塑膠接腳,而較昂貴的專業的鏡頭會使用金屬接腳。一般來說,金屬接腳會比較耐用的及當鏡頭改變很多。當相機主要使用一個鏡頭,接腳物料並不是很重要。 內置對焦內置對焦鏡頭不會因設定焦點而改變其大小。 固定前鏡頭固定前鏡頭在變焦及/或對焦時不會轉動,故可容許攝影師用花瓣狀遮光罩,固定前鏡頭能更容易利用極化濾鏡。 |
|
| 可用的接環 | Nikon F |
| 應用 | 風景, 室內, 建築物 |
| 類目 | 廣角變焦 |
| 倍增器 | 1× |
| 穩定器 | 否 |
| 焦距 | 17 - 35 mm (2.1× 變焦) |
| 鏡片組 | 10 群組含有13 元素 |
| 視角 |
35毫米: 104-62° 數碼: 79-44° |
| 葉片數目 | 9 |
| 最大光圈 | 廣角: f/2.8 遠攝: f/2.8 |
| 最小光圈 | 廣角: f/22 遠攝: 不適用 |
| 最短焦距 | 28 cm |
| 放大 | 0.22× |
| 濾鏡大小 | 77 mm |
| 大小 | ∅ 82.5 × 106 mm |
| 重量 | 745 g |
| 記錄 |
|
| 自動對焦速度 | 不適用 |
| 自動對焦聲音 | |
| 內置對焦 | 是 |
| 內置變焦 | 不適用 |
| 固定前鏡頭 | 是 |
| 接駁類型 | 鐵 |
| 天氣密封 | 不適用 |
| 插入濾鏡 | 不適用 |
| 超聲波自動對焦 | 是 |
| APS-C大小的圈 | 否 |
| 低散光度鏡頭元素 | 是 |
| 硬機殼 | 不適用 |
| 軟機殼 | CL-76 (包含) |
| 遮光罩 |
HB-23 (包含) 可印刷的遮光罩 |
| 三腳架接合器 | 不適用 |
11 October 2003
Of the auto-focus Nikkor lenses, I've owned the 20/2.8D, 24/2.8D, and 35-70/2.8D. My current lenses are the AF80-200/2.8D (2-ring version), and the AFS17-35/2.8D. That's all is needed for my general photography. Any distortion can be easily created in Photoshop CS.
The AFS17-35/2.8D is the sharpest lens of all the manual and auto-focus Nikkor lenses I have owned/used. Since purchasing this lens almost 3 years ago, it has become the standard lens on my Nikon F5.
I travel with the AFS17-35/2.8D and (in my opinion) it's natural companion the AF80-200/2.8D. Both zoom lenses are ranked number 1 and 2 in sharpness respectively.
The lens, mounted on an F5, was dropped 3.5 feet in a thinly cushioned bag onto a concrete walkway. The back of the F5 took the impact. According to Nikon Canada, the lens survived but the F5 needed a new $400+ autofocus assembly.
29 June 2004
This lens is widely held to be one of the best if not the best wide angle professional zoom lens for 35mm and Digital SLRs compatible with Nikon's lens system. I've had mine for about 6 months on a Nikon D-100 and have absolutely nothing I don't like about it. It's sharp from corner to corner at all zoom settings and any pincusion destortion is negligible even at 17mm @ f2.8. The AFS focusing motor is lightning fast and accurate. Filter size is 77mm, same as my Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR lens. Since filters this size aren't cheap, it's nice to be able to share. This lens will support 35mm, APS, and DX format film and digital sensor sizes and comes with a 5-year warranty. If you want the best, and can afford it, you won't be sorry you purchased this lens.
21 June 2007
I wanted to like this lens badly based on what I needed in my bag and what was said here and at other sites. Unfortunately I found the lens to be unacceptably soft between f/2.8 and 4.5. If I would have been a little more careful in my research I would have noticed this to be a common observation though for landscape photographers they don't mind as they're typically stopped down anyway. But for me, to consider the 17-35mm as a replacement for the kit 18-70 as a near-full time lens I just couldn't justify the price/quality ratio when I'd have to stop the lens down to where the kit lens is to get to the sweet spot. I guess I'll have to start looking for the 17-55mm option where it is said to excel at the wider open aperature.
5 January 2006
The image that Amazon is showing is not the Nikon 17-35mm.
7 November 2007
At $1,500, this lens should be mint straight from the factory. My copy failed to auto-focus properly and appeared to have serious backfocus issues. Although the "Silent Wave Motor" made for very quick focusing times (if the copy had been focusing properly), it made a pronounced metal-on-metal or metal-on-plastic, high-pitched scraping sound at times. I understand this is endemic in many copies. Lastly, I did not think I would miss the added focal length of a 17-55mm or 18-55mm, but that extra 36mm-55mm range really does make a difference, and makes this lens less usable for DSLRs. More importantly, when focused (by chance), the optics did not produce sharpness substantially superior to my other, less expensive, DX lenses.
On the other hand, this lens is not as heavy or large as other reviewers have noted. I would have no problem carrying the 17-35mm all day, every day. Perhaps my review would have been different if I received a different copy. But for $1,500, this should never happen. We as consumers should not be forced to return substandard equipment in order to ultimately get a copy that works.