Objektívkereső

Tippek:
Írjon legalább 2 karaktert
Próbálja meg így szűkíteni a keresést: pl. 70 300 is
Ha hasznosnak találja ezt az oldalt, akkor vásárolja meg objektívjeit és kiegészítőit partnereinktől. Köszönjük a támogatását.

Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical

 

Teljes méretű vetített kép

Az APS-C méretű képet vetítő objektíveket kimondottan a digitális fényképezőgépekhez fejlesztették, ezért nem használhatók filmes gépeken, vagy olyan digitális fényképezőgépeken, amelyekben az APS-C méretűnél nagyobb érzékelő található.

 

Nem ultrahangos AF-es

Az ultrahangos automatikus élességállítással szerelt objektívek általában halkabbak és gyorsabbak, mint a tradicionálisan működő objektívek.

 

Egy vagy több alacsony szórású lencsetag is van benne

Az alacsony szórású lencsetagok segítenek csökkenteni a kromatikus aberrációt.

 

Nem stabilizált

A képstabilizátor segít csökkenteni a kéz remegéséből adódó elmosódásokat. A stabilizátor hatása elsősorban nagy gyújtótávolságnál és gyenge megvilágításnál érezhető. A képstabilizátor 1-3 fényértéknyi előnyt biztosít a nem stabilizált objektívekhez képest.

 

Fém bajonett

Az olcsóbb objektívek általában műanyag, míg a drágábbak fém bajonettel készülnek. Általában a fém bajonettek tartósabbak, így gyakori objektívcserénék ez a szerencsésebb. Ha egy fényképezőgépet főleg egy objektívvel használunk, akkor a bajonett anyaga nem annyira lényeges.

 

Belső élességállítású

A belső élességállítású objektívek mérete az élességállítás során nem változik.

 

A front lencse fix

A fix frontlencse az élesség és/vagy a gyújtótávolság állításakor nem fordul el. Ez lehetővé teszi, hogy a fotós szirom alakú napellenzőt használjon. A fix frontlencse megjönnyíti a polarizációs szűrők használatát is.

 

Nincs becsúsztatható szűrő

A becsúsztatható szűrőket olyan objektíveknél alkalmazzák, amelyek frontlencséje túl nagy, illetve amelyek látószöge túl nagy ahhoz, hogy hagyományos szűrőket lehessen rájuk tenni. Általában a nagy fényerejű tele, illetve az ultra-nagy látószögű objektíveknél fordul elő ez a megoldás.

Az ideális, minden szempontból kiegyensúlyozott ultra nagy látószögű zoom objektív. A kiváló képminőség, a kis méret és a remek használhatóság révén ez az ultra nagy látószögű zoom objektív lendületes fotók készítését teszi lehetővé, amelyeken a főtéma hangsúlyosan kiemelkedik a széles háttér előtt. A hagyományos 35 mm-es tükörreflexes fényképezőgépekkel való használata esetén a Tamron új ultra nagy látószögű zoom objektívjének átfogása már 17 mm-nél kezdődik. Az APS méretű szenzorral rendelkező digitális SLR fényképezőgépek esetén a gyújtótávolság 28-tól 55 mm-ig terjed (35 mm-es filmes formátumban), ami lefedi a kívánt nagy látószög és az alapérték közötti tartományt.

Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical Specifikáció

Elérhető bajonett(ek) Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K, Sony / Minolta A
Felhasználási terület(ek) Tájkép, Belső terek, Épület
Kategóriák Nagy látószögű zoom
Szorzó
Stabilizátor nem
Gyújtótávolság 17 - 35 mm (2,1× zoom)
Objektív felépítése 14 lencsetag 11 csoportban
Látószög 35mm: 104-63°
digitális: nincs adat
Lamellák száma 7
Legnagyobb blende nagy látószög: f/2,8 tele: f/4
Legkisebb blende nagy látószög: f/22 tele: f/32
Legkisebb tárgytávolság 30 cm
Nagyítás 0,19×
Szűrőmenet 77 mm
Méret ∅ 83.2 × 86.5 mm
Tömeg 440 g
Megjegyzések
AF sebesség nincs adat
AF hang
Belső élességállítás igen
Belső zoom nincs adat
Fix frontlencse igen
Bajonett típusa fém
Időjárásálló nincs adat
Becsúsztatható szűrők nem
Ultrahangos AF nem
APS-C méretű vetített kép nem
Alacsony szórású lencsetag igen
Kemény tok nincs adat
Puha tok nincs adat
Napellenző tartozék
nyomtatható napellenző
Állvány adapter nincs adat
Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical Specifikáció

Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical Tesztek

Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical a hírekben

Other reviews

Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical Olvasói tesztek

Leghasznosabb olvasói vélemények az Amazonról

Surprisingly Pleasant

2006. október 05.

I ordered this lens as the wide end adjunct to my f2.8 lenses (100, 135, 28 -70 & 70-200mm). I am anticipating a full-frame in the future and I still have a couple of very nice 35mm cameras so I passed on the Tamron digital only 17-50 f2.8. I was extremely pleased with my first "real world" low light test of this lens. You see I shoot billiards (pool) competitiions which is low artificial light and absolutely no FLASH. This lens handled the challenge with swift Auto Focus and sharp contrasty images. The minimum focus distance is amazing and an unexpect bonus. This lens has gotten me to wonder if the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 is equal or better than. So, I am looking to find out. It couldn't hurt having two great lenses in that range?

I hope this is helpful. I know it isn't a technical review so to speak. I judge things on the real world results I get and if they live up to my expectations of "the shot" - and this did. That is why I would recommend it to anyone looking for a lens that will provide wide end speed/low light capability with the flexibility to go full-frame (and ultra wide) if needed. Happy hunting!

Don't blow your budget on two lenses, blow it on this one lens!

2006. december 14.

I've read in many articles about how amateurs blow thier budget for lenses on two or more instead of blowing on a solid lens. I took the advice to buy the best that I can afford for one, an I'm truly delighted. This lens is a step up from the kit lens you would get with the K100/110/10d's, and performs much better.

Pros:
-- Max aperture of 2.8 is nice to get more focused on your subject, and for lower light situations. Most kit lenses have a max of 3.5 or more.
-- Good for moderate wide angle shots.

Cons:
-- It's a bit heavier then the kit lenses.

A very sharp lens with good contrast

2006. január 23.

On a 1.6x crop factor camera like the Canon 350D/20D, the effective area of this lens is equivalent to a 27-56mm lens on a old school film-based SLR camera. As I come from a background of extensive 50mm lens use, I find this to be my most common working range (and I have four other excellent lenses in my bag to choose from).

My reason for purchase was to replace the pathetic kit lens that comes with the 350D. The Tamron is a much faster lens at f/2.8-4, and as it is designed for full-frame SLR use, the photos you'll get on a 1.6x crop factor camera are outstanding. The edges are sharp and just as bright as the center. In fact, the images produced with this lens are so sharp that you'll find yourself reducing the in-camera sharpening for portraiture. Additionally, my photos show great contrast and need very little--if any--post processing.

I do have a few complaints about this lens. First, the lens hood's diameter is enormous (over 4"), and I wish there were a smaller hood for 1.6x crop factor camera use. Second, like all Tamron lenses that I have encountered, the manual focus ring moves during autofocus. Third, the focus should be faster and much quieter. However, in light of all the positive aspects going for this lens these are minor issues.

Reviewers on other websites have given this lens outstanding marks, and it was only after careful research that I decided on purchasing it. I was then off to Thailand where this lens truly proved its worth.

Superb optical quality and fast for an amazing price

2006. január 05.

This is about the same range of the Canon 17-40mm F/4L lens and offer equivalent and sometimes superior optical quality and it's F/2.8 at the wide end. The lens is super sharp and very contrasty, with fast auto-focusing and a good feel on the focusing ring. The best part is this fast and optical superb lens is about half of price of the Canon 17-40mm lens. A true steal. Can't say enough good things about it. I am posting some sample pictures to show how good the image quality is, too bad the image size can't be bigger because the sharpness from this lens is truly amazing.

L series move over!

2005. február 07.

If you have read my review for the Canon i9900 you know that I shoot for Federal Law Enforcement and the military, with them I shoot prime OEM lens not third party lens...

However I cannot personally afford OEM lens so I shoot third party, this Tamron lens is by far the best third party lens I have ever used. It is built very sturdy, not flimsy feeling as third party lenses can feel. It is very sharp, and the outer frame distortion is very low. The Bokeh(circles of confusion) are very nice as well. I think this is worhty in anyones camera bag!

Dennis

Wide angle lens winner.

2007. február 13.

Wide angle lenses have got to be the love-hate lens in any high end camera collection. You are always giving up something. Zooms especially engender frustration as they are least able to tease away the annoying reality of wide angle problems.

Except in a very high end models, the sensors don't see the full 1:1 range, so any lens tends to be somewhat telephoto (zoomed in). So now a wide angle lens , zoomed in a bit by that geometry, may stand in to serve as a more standard viewing lens to offset that inherent zoom (from the digital sensor). In that case, variable zooming sure would be nice to have - but not if wide angle optical problems come with it.

So go totally broke (a lens over $1500) or put up with some form of nasty edge lighting problems, distortion, color shift etc. One brand of wide angle - a well known brand - has a great potential version with great sounding specs, but gets it right on maybe half (huge problem with bad manufacture). Nope. Crap shoot.

This brand's version, Tamron, is rock solid, inexpensive for the level of image quality, and can serve as the default lens to leave on your digital SLR. It's that good. Whatever they did to make this lens, you are not aware of seeing "wide angleness" when viewing the images.

And yes you could go wider in angle with other choices, maybe buy the Russian fisheye for really extreme purposes. That's not an alternative for this lens, especially on a 1.6 conversion as with most digital backs. The one reviewed here, got a good work out on a Canon Rebel, given as a gift to a professional photographer whose images with it are just wonderful.

Now I want one for me.

Great Wide Angle Lens

2005. október 06.

I bought the Tamron 17-35 for my Canon 20D, to compliment the Tamron 28-75 XR DI which I liked a lot.

The 17-35 range is definitely wide angle, and not much use beyond that. The lens is great for indoors shooting, and outdoor shots where you want to get in close with your subject or your looking for some wide panoramas.

Right out of the box, I started taking shots that seem reminiscent of some National Geographic indoor/people shots. Tthis lens will give you shots and a perspective that only professionals have the luxury of.

The lens is definitely sharp with good contrast. It's nice to have F2.8 at 17mm. Very interesting to watch the max aperture change to F4 in what seems to be a fairly short zoom range.

The lens surface is somewhat bulbous and almost sticks out as far as the edge of the lens, which makes me wonder if it will be easy to get scratched. Somehow a UV filter doesn't seem like the answer.

I haven't had a problem with flare but then I know how to steer backlit shots.

Build quality is very good, up to the usual Tamron high standards.

For some reason I rated the lens at 4 stars, whereas I rated the Tamron 28-75 at 5 stars (see my other reviews).

I'm not sure why I rated the lens lower than the 28-75, but maybe it just speaks to the usefulness of the lens.

The 17-35 is not the lens your likely to have attached to your camera most of the time. Certainly a 28-75 is more practical.

But, for the price, it is definitely a lens that can have its applications, and separate some of your shots from the rest of the crowd.

I would recommend this lens as a wide angle, for sure. Given the price and build quality, its a very good value.

Nice going, Tamron!

2007. február 03.

For film cameras, 17-35mm has become the most versatile "very wide angle" zoom range. With digital bodies this focal range translates to ca. 25-52mm, what makes this lens a "wide to standard" zoom. Because the lens is calculated for full 35mm size frame, vignetting is not a problem. Most of full frame lenses are in their best sugar spot, when used on DX sized digital sensors, and this Tamron is not an exception.

The lens is not f2.8 in its entire range, but seemingly Tamron chose to design it this way as a compromise toward making it small and light. Compare this lens to the Nikkor 17-35 f2.8 AFS, both in terms of weight, and also in terms of its very attractive price. Of course, for some users all this plastic is just "too cheap" and is not an acceptable option. Personally I vote rather for less grams/pounds, if optical valors are comparable.

The lens seems to be quite sharp, and tests confirm its excellent resolution. Mine has only very little distortions, however I saw exemplars of this lens exhibiting visibly more barrel distortions! Probably the manufacturing tolerances are not tight enough...

Front element does not rotate with focusing, but the focusing ring rotates and thus the lens does not support the automatic AF/MF overwrite, like in a AFS Nikkor or in a usual Canon EF lens.

The hood is a total loss. It simply reflects too much light on its internal side. Tamron should really coat their hoods for better light absorption, like others do! Fortunately, this lens seem to control flare quite well. I tend to shade the lens with a hand anyway.

Considering the very attractive price, resolution and weight, this is a good product, great value for the money. If you do not like plastic like that, consider than the need to spend $1200 for the genuine Nikkor alternative, and maybe than the plastic will not appear that bad after all.

My generic problem with all Di XP Tamron lenses is however their lack of good grip to perform quick lens exchange. When changing this lens, you will end up turning both focusing and zooming rings to some degree, sometimes to a lot of degree... I wish that Tamron would have made the both rings a bit shorter, and provided good grip in the middle to turn the lens reliably into and out of the mount.

Great Lens!

2008. november 02.

Since I am not super-professional making money from taking pictures, I was looking for a reasonably priced wide angle lens for my Nikon D700 camera. This Tamron lens is exactly what I needed. It focuses very fast and I take great quality pictures with it.

NOTE!!! If you use the same (or similar in functionality) camera as I do (D700), don't forget to move the lens's aperture ring to the locked position! Otherwise you will get an error message on your camera. With the locked ring on the lens you control the lens's aperture by the CAMERA dial (in manual M or A modes). Another word, the aperture ring should stay at locked (at 22) in any mode, but the actual aperture will depend on the camera setting.

Tamron 17-35mm

2009. január 08.

I've often read the great reviews Tamron lenses get in magazines and have often thought of buying one, but always ended up going for a cheaper option. Finally, I decided to buy this. Was it worth the little extra? The answer is a resounding YES. The lens feels much better built and the results are far superior. The photographs are as sharp as they could possibly be and the colour saturaton is amazing. The lens covers 17-35mm which is great for covering the wide angle/standard range. Anyone who buys this is in for a treat.

Very sharp, low barrel distortion, fast and light weight - all at the right price.

2008. november 12.

Bought this lens for my Nikon D50 camera. Coupled with circular polirizing filter and great blue skies (with a dash of clouds) this lens can capture amazing shots. I won't bother you with all the tech details - you can read that on the product description page. This lens needs good light - by that I mean good amount of natural light or an assist from your add-on flash. My camera's built-in flash is barely adequate to capture the wide-angled shots. Under good lighting conditions even the basic jpg shots show vertually no pixelation noise. I've kept it mounted on my camera ever since I bought it. Sharp, fast and light-weight - that's enough to make me happy. Very satisfied. Thank you Tamron for yet another great lens.

Nice fast lens.

2007. február 27.

I bought this lens for use indoors at family gatherings and for scenery. I knew this was a fast lens (f/2.8) but was surprised at the physical size of it. I was also amazed at the filter size it required as well. Anyway, I gave the lens to my son (we both shoot with Nikon D50s) and he LOVES this lens. He has taken hundreds of images with it and the ones I have seen are GREAT. Sharp and clear. I should mention that I went with the Sigma 18-50mm because it was physically smaller, utilizes the 58mm filter size available in my camera bag, and cost about $200 less.

Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical Kiegészítők

Napellenzők a Tamron SP AF17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di LD Aspherical objektívre

77 mm Szűrők

77 mm Polár szűrők

77 mm UV szűrők

77 mm Skylight szűrők

77 mm Objektívsapkák

Copyright 2006 - 2010 © Pixinfo Kft. | Weboldal dizájn | Logó dizájn | Szerver hoszting | Snapfish online fotókidolgozás