Full frame sized imageLenses that create APS-C sized image are designed for digital only. They cannot be used on cameras that have image sensor larger than the APS-C format. These lenses are not suitable for film cameras either. Ultrasonic AFLenses with ultrasonic focusing mechanism tend to be quiter and faster than traditionally focusing lenses. One or more Low Dispersion lens element is usedLow Dispersion lens elements help to reduce chromatic aberration. Not stabilizedImage stabilization helps to reduce blur caused by hand shake, especially at high focal length or in low light situations. Image stabilization can give 1 to 3 stop advantage over none stabilized lens, based on the reciprocal rule. Metal mountCheaper lenses are usually equipped with plastic mount, while more expensive, professional lenses have metal mount. In general, metal mounts are more durable, and a good thing to have when lenses are changed a lot. When a camera is used mainly with one lens, the material of the lens mount is not that important. Internal FocusingInternally focusing lenses don't change their size while setting focus. Internal ZoomInternally zooming lenses don't change their size while focal length is changing. The front lens is fixedThe fixed front lens is not rotating during zoom and/or focusing. This allows the photographer to use petal shaped lens hood. Fixed front lenses also make the use of polarization filters a lot easier. Not SealedWeather sealed lenses are protected from dust and water. While they are not water proof, these lenses can be used in rain and other humid environments. Some sealings only provide protection against dust or water, not both. Sealing is only available when the lens is used on a similarly weather sealed camera body. No drop-in filter supportDrop-in filters are used in those lenses where either the front lens is too large, or the field of view doesn't permit the use of traditional filters at the front of the lens. Usually bright tele and ultra-wide angle lenses support this filter type. |
|
|
The AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED lens is highly versatile and can be ideal for a range of different photographic applications. Photojournalists can tell the entire story with a single shot, interior photography can be done without fisheye distortion, or a breathtaking landscape can be captured in one frame.
|
| Available mount(s) | Nikon F |
| Application(s) | Landscape, Interiors, Architecture |
| Category(s) | Wide angle zoom |
| Multiplier | 1× |
| Stabilizer | no |
| Focal length | 14 - 24 mm (1.7× zoom) |
| Lens construction | 11 elements in 11 groups |
| Angle of view |
35mm: 114-84° digital: 90-61° |
| Number of blades | 9 |
| Maximum aperture | wide: f/2.8 tele: f/2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | wide: f/22 tele: f/22 |
| Minimum focusing distance | 28 cm |
| Magnification | N/A |
| Filter size | N/A |
| Size | ∅ 98 x 131,5 mm |
| Weight | 1000 g |
| Notes |
3 ED, 3 aspherical and 1 Nano Crystal Coat-deposited lens elements, built-in lens hood |
| AF speed | N/A |
| AF sound | |
| Internal focusing | yes |
| Internal zoom | yes |
| Fix front lens | yes |
| Mount type | metal |
| Weather sealed | no |
| Drop in filter | no |
| Ultrasonic AF | yes |
| APS-C sized circle | no |
| Low dispersion lens element | yes |
| Hard case | not included |
| Soft case | CL-M3 (included) |
| Lens hood | included |
| Tripod adapter | not included |
Dec 28, 2007
Nikon's new 14-24 lens is just phenomenal. The clarity is that of a prime lens. In fact, this super-wide angle zoom lens effectively replaces the equivalent prime lenses within most of its focal length (except perhaps the 24mm range); it's like owning a bag full of prime lenses that have been combined to make one superlative zoom lens.
Yes, it's that good. If you check around the web, you will see the pros falling over themselves for this lens after they test it. It's built like a tank and is precise as a Swiss watch.
Highly recommended.
Jan 14, 2008
If you want an amazing ultra wide angle lens for both FF and DX, this should be your choice hands-down. My old Sigma 12-24mm is a laugher by comparison. Talk about clarity and detail! Nothing out there comes close! Better than my old AF 20mm 2.8. The only down side is the inability to use filters, and the fixed hood is just a bit too wide for my Lee LF filter holder. But, in these Photoshop days, most filter effects can be post-processed as long as the image isn't overexposed. If it wasn't for this inconvenience, this would be a 5-star lens all the way.
Mar 5, 2008
It is quite shocking to hold this 2.8 ultrawide lens. This lens is a standard-setter. It is SO SHARP wide open that you will be amazed. I read one review that said that it eliminates a bag of primes.
Yes, it is large. Yes, it is heavy. Yes, the front element is exposed and potentially vulnerable (use the lens cap!). Yes, it is not as wide as the DX lenses on DX bodies: Sigma 10-20, Tokina/Nikon 12-24. Yes, it is expensive. Yes, it is not as wide as some on DX cameras...
BUT this is a keeper and - somehow - when you mount the lens, and hold it, all those problems disappear. Will I take it hiking in Shenandoah? Nah, I put the Sigma 10-20 on for wide mucky stuff...
If you own a DX camera currently (all but D3 owners), you can invest in your FX future. BUT, it works phenomenally well on DX sensors like my D300... Helps me take great images...
A great piece of kit, as my British friends would say...
Feb 25, 2008
I got it about month and a half ago. I used Tokina 12-24 before and was not very happy with the edge performance. 14-24 is the only wide lens that lets me get the resolution that I expect from medium range and telephoto zoom lenses. Color and contrast are amazing. Much more even than my 17-55 Nikon. Very good built and handling. Over all, very happy!
That being said you should also remember:
It is not as wide as 10-12 APS-C ones.
Cannot use it with filter; both for safety and visual effect.
Flare appears more often than with 12-24.
Apr 28, 2008
I am impressed with the lack of distortion and flare in such a fast and complex lens. Color correction and fidelity are exceptional and the build quality seems fine. Sharpness is not quite what I expected, but far better than with many other new lenses I have tried recently. My only criticism would be for the design of the plastic lens cap that is only held on by friction. It falls off easily and this will probably get worse with time - a poor solution for a high price lens.