Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Specifikáció

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Tesztek

Other reviews

• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.ephotozine.com oldalon (angol)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.pbase.com oldalon (angol)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.bobatkins.com oldalon (angol)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.luminous-landscape.com oldalon (angol)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.cameralabs.com oldalon (angol)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a pixinfo.com oldalon (magyar)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.sg.hu oldalon (magyar)
• Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM teszt a www.e-fotografija.com oldalon (szlovén)

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Olvasói tesztek

Leghasznosabb olvasói vélemények az Amazonról

Very good lens, but expensive

2005. március 28.

I am very impressed with this lens. I didn't realize just how wide-angle this lens was. At 10mm, I can stand just a few feet in front of a 13-story building, and get the whole thing in the picture, from the entrance to the top of the building.

As with all very-wide lenses, you have to be careful that you don't have people at the edges of the frame or too close to the lens, or they will appear very distorted when taking pictures at 10mm. Also note that a wide angle lens is not easy to use at first to create compelling images, as it's very easy to include too much clutter in your compositions.

PROS
- optical quality is excellent (deserves an "L" lens designation)
- uses the higher quality ring-type USM focusing
- minimum focusing distance is very close
- surprisingly lightweight
- very flare-resistant even without hood
- the only option for EOS digital cameras (Rebel, Rebel XT, 20D) to get true wide angle shots due to the smaller APS-C sensor in those cameras.

CONS
- It's expensive! But at least it is cheaper than a year ago.
- The lens is a little soft in the corners at 10mm, but is very sharp at 12mm and up.
- Canon has not formally committed to how long they will continue to make cameras and lenses using the EF-S system.
- The lens currently only works on the lower-end dSLR cameras -- the 10D, 1D, 1Ds, and 5D cameras cannot use this lens.
- The hood is not included with this lens, but it's such as ugly hood and the lens doesn't have flare problems, so I don't really think it is necessary anyway.

In 5 years when you upgrade your camera, there is a possibility that it will not support this lens. This depends on what direction Canon goes in making camera sensors:
1) continue to make cameras that use the smaller APS-C sensor, and keep improving its density to support more and more resolution. This will help keep the dSLR cameras smaller and lighter, and will necessitate making EF-S lenses the standard.
2) make the sensors match the size of a frame of 35mm film. And at the same time increase the density to yield even more resolution. Right now sensors this big are very expensive to produce.

I now think that #2 is more likely to happen. All the other lenses out there are built for a 35mm-film-sized sensor, and now that Canon has released another full-frame camera (5D) at a lower price, I'm betting that in another few years the APS-C sensor will be practically obsolete. A 5D body and 16-35 or 17-40 lens will give you better results than a 20D with this lens, but the difference in price between the two setups is a few thousand dollars right now.

The 10-22 is an excellent lens, but it will probably not hold its value as well as the Canon 16-35 and 17-40 lenses. A slightly more affordable alternative is the Sigma 10-20mm, which sounds like it nearly equals the optical quality of this lens.

The answer to the crop sensor problem.

2006. november 20.

My take on this lens is that it is an "L" quality optic in a fine, non "L" package. There is nothing else on the market to compete with it (nothing at all), and it produces supurb images. It isn't an f/2.8 lens, but it is close enough for most uses. The competition from Tamron is a full stop slower, not as sharp, and is awful in dim light compared to the Canon 10-22 lens (sorry, Tamron fans, but the Tamron lens isn't even playing in the same ballpark).

I use this lens on a 30D body, and I always keep it on hand if I'm doing any indoor, or tight group photography. It is the perfect solution to the perennial problem of not having enough room to capture all the kids at a birthday party in one shot because your back is up against a wall. This lens will just about get your toes into the picture at the widest setting, yet delivers tack sharp, colorful, and contrasty images. The auto focus is spot on, silent, and fast. It is a must have lens for the active amateur, or any pro using a 1.6 crop factor camera. You simply can't beat this lens with anything available on the market today.

That beng said, do not try to convince yourself that this will make a good "walkaround" lens. It isn't. Even at max length, it is far too short to live on your camera as a standard lens. You need this lens, even if you don't know it yet, but it should not be your first lens, as it will only be used 15 to 20 percent of the time. At those times, it's performance simply cannot be equaled by any other zoom lens on a 1.6 crop factor camera. You will be amazed by the quality of this lens. It rivals the performance of modern prime lenses, presents a bright viewfinder image, and delivers the goods in tight situations.

This is not a casual assessment, nor a Canon "feel good" moment on my part. I developed my first B&W contact prints in 1964, in my own darkroom at the age of 9 (my parents were concerned:)), and have been an avid photographer ever since. Small, medium, and large format cameras and lenses have passed through my hands over the years, and Canon has become my favorite small format brand. Still, Canon builds some trash lenses that should be avoided. The 10-22 USM is not one of them :).

Before you go out and buy this lens, you should already own the EF-S 17-55mm IS f/2.8 lens. That is the king of 1.6 crop factor standard lenses, and includes the awesome Canon IS feature. It will end up being mounted on your camera 80% of the time, and keep you smiling after every shoot. Get that lens first. Then, get the 10-22mm lens. Then, let your imagination run wild, and plan on serious telephoto lenses for the future. Trust me or not, the two lenses mentioned above will provide you with photographic tools that will astound you. Get them in your kit as soon as you can afford them.

A little warning about either lens.... Some here will argue the point, but with either lens, get a GOOD quality UV filter that is multi-coated on both sides, and built extra thin to avoid vignetting at wide lens settings. A good filter will cost a little less than one hundred Dollars, and can cost up to one hundred forty Dollars. The minimum brand would be Hoya Pro 1 multi coated filters, and the ante goes up from there.

Everything else is garbage, including the Canon "sharp cut" filter that costs less than fifty bucks. No kidding, no conjecture. If you use cheap filters, you will never see what your lens can really do. Ever. No doubt that many will respond with claims that their twenty Dollar filter works just fine, but they simply don't know any better, and have never used their expensive equipment to it's full potential. It's akin to a Chevy owner passing judgement on a Mercedes Benz. The Chevy might feel real good, but until you own the Mercedes, you just have no clue.

Bottom line.... Make sure that the quality of your filters exceed the quality of your lenses. Yes, at a hundred bucks a pop for a 77mm filter, it hurts, but you will never regret it. Also, Amazon does not stock lens hoods for all non L Canon lenses. The price is stupid high for those hoods, but they make a night and day difference in in picture quality. Whenever you order a non L Canon lens, find a web seller who has the hood in stock, and get it right now. Again, you will never regret owning it.

That's it for my review/rant. Buy this lens. Buy the 17-55 IS f/2,8 first. Buy the lens hoods for both. Toss any "kit" lenses that came with the camera in the trash bin (where they belong), and be very happy.

The best lens I own

2005. március 30.

I have had this lens for several months now and let me start out by saying WOW. I looked at the lens in the store along with the Sigma 12-24 and I was in total awe of what I saw though the view finder with the Canon 10-22. This is an ultra wide angle lens that is incredible. I went home and thought about where I would use this lens and determined that I would use it quite a bit. I went ahead and bought the lens and I continue to be more impressed with it every time I use it. I have used the lens for both close-up (which can give you some very interesting distortion shots)and wide angle shots with great success.

The 10-22mm is equivalent to 16-35mm field of view using a canon 20D which is not a full frame sensor. With a minimum focal distance of .24m (about 9.5 inches) you can get very close to objects and still get alot of focal width in the photo. There is incredible clarity in the lens. The photos I have taken are very clear with only a slight hint of softening at the corners at 10mm; everything else is sharp after that. There is a little barrel distortion at 10mm but everything else up to 22mm is nice. I have not gotten any light flare in my photos. The Ultrasonic motor is very quiet. The depth of field is outstanding. A slim UV filter helps prevent some slight vignetting at 10mm. With a maximum aperture that ranges from f/3.5 to f/4.5, the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Lens is a medium speed lens. I would recommend using a tripod if you are at all unsure about your ability to hold the camera still for action shots with this lens. The lens it's self is fairly light weight. If you are going to use filters the lens requires 77mm.

The lens can produce some interesting distortion shots if you are taking close-ups and are not perpendicular to the object. For close-up shots with out distortion it is best to be perpendicular to the object.

Inside the lens housing there are three aspherical lens elements and a Super UD element that produce clear vibrant shots. The lens it's self sturdily built and comfortable to handle.

A lens worth buying a digital slr for

2005. szeptember 02.

I've been more or less addicted to wide angle photography for the last 20 years or thereabouts. Unfortunately, ultra wide angle shooters have been left out of reasonably accessible digital slr photography until very recently. Now there are several viable name brand options available, namely the Canon 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 reviewed here, the Nikon 12-24mm f4, and the Zuiko 7-14mm f4. Because of the 3 different crop factors involved, these lenses end up being pretty close in (35mm equivalent) effective range; 16-35 for the Canon, 18-36 for the Nikon, and 14-28 for the Olympus. Many will caution against purchasing these lenses since they cannot cover the full frame 24x36 format, and cannot even be mounted on a regular body. In the Olympus' case, it doesn't matter since the company has staked its fortunes on the smaller 4/3rds sensor format, and has opened it up to other manufacturers such as Fuji and Panasonic. With the Nikon and Canon, you are taking a leap of faith that the companies will continue to produce 1.5 and 1.6 crop factor sensors into the future so that you will be able to take your crop-only lenses to upgraded digital bodies down the line. To my mind, Olympus has already demonstrated the desirable technical characteristics of a smaller sensor format, so there is good reason to believe that smaller than full frame sensors are here to stay. By extending the glass beyond the mount and into the body, and/or covering a smaller circle, Canon and Nikon are providing those same technical benefits to users of their smaller sensor cameras, namely sharp, extra wide angle in a compact package. Besides which, I'm much more concerned with the photos I couldn't take if I stayed away from the product, than I am with its unknown future upgrade path.

While the Olympus lens and 4/3rds system was intriguing, I felt that the 7-14mm wasn't worth more than double the price of the Canon for 2 extra mm at the wide end. It's also double the weight - making it impractical for use as an everyday lens, and negating the advantages of the E-1 body. So, I was pretty much down to the Canon or the Nikon (or the always available Waitsomemore).

At this point, I should say I'm platform agnostic. In the 80's I happily used Minolta equipment. In the 90's I bought some Nikon gear to use their 15mm prime lens. Basically, if it suits my purposes, I don't care what the label is.

Back to the lenses. The Nikon is more expensive and less wide, but it does have the continuous maximum apeture throughout the range. The Canon is wider, a tad lighter, and a tiny amount faster at the wide end. Both appear to be excellent choices, but I could not consider them independently of the cameras they would be mated to. Since I did not already own a digital body, it also came down to a decision between the Canon 20d & Nikon D70s. Here, the Canon wins for me on quality of sensor and a host of other details.

In practice, the lens is a joy to use. It's sharp. The zoom allows it to be as wide as you need it, which is an improvement over my previous favorite Minolta 20mm 2.8, though it does lack the depth of field scales which the Minolta has. The zoom also allows for keeping the lens mounted without switching as often, and that's important for keeping out dust. It's a very solidly built, quality instrument. Focus is fast if you're into that sort of thing, and nearly silent with the ultrasonic motor. The lens does not extend in length for zooming or focusing, though the front elements do move slightly inside the barrel. Mated to the 20d it's a tool that exceeds my previous film cameras in just about every way imaginable. I'm finally free to make the ultrawide photos that I want to make in the digital domain and the initial results have been outstanding.

If you're into ultrawide and want to go digital, the 20d with 10-22 is a fantastic setup. If you've already gone digital and want to try wide angle, (assuming your camera can use ef-s lenses) this is a true bargain - you get a 16mm, 20mm, 24mm, 28mm, and 35mm all rolled into one. It makes me positively giddy. Thank you, Canon!

What can I say? Very soft.

2007. szeptember 02.

I can hear the comments already. "You must have gotten a bad one" etc. I grant you, one cannot expect perfection (or even consistent quality?) for $675. And I have no doubt that the Sigma ultra wide zoom is even worse. But based on the comments I read I wasn't prepared for the results this lens produces.

I'm not going to boast about how long I've been taking photos. But for the benefit of those who are new to this stuff let me summarize. There are no bad macro lenses (not even Sigma). There are virtually no bad telephoto lenses. There aren't even many bad telephoto zooms anymore. Not surprisingly, Canon's L lenses in these categories are excellent and so are most of their non-L lenses and everybody else's lenses too. Low dispersion, aspherics, apochromatic correction--these days, everybody's got 'em.

But just as there are no bad 80-200mm lenses, there are no really exceptional wide angle zooms. Read the comments on Canon's $1600, 16-35 L lens. Its OK but neither the original or the new "improved" model is spectacular. These lenses always have barrel distortion at the wide end, soft corners and vignetting. Some of this has to do with ultra-wides being used with digital sensors but the fact remains.

OK, so I decided to go digital. Since the 5D didn't even have a dust removal feature I decided to get a couple Rebels. Picture quality from the Rebels is very similar to the 20D/30D and I'm not going to hammer nails with them so Rebels are fine.

If you want any sort of wide angle with a Rebel or 20D/30D/40D, the 10-22 lens is pretty much it. Besides, Canon's 20, 24, 28 are nothing special so why not get the zoom and if need be, use software like DxO to correct any lens flaws. That was the plan but this lens just isn't sharp enough at the edges or in the corners. It reminded me of a Spiratone/Sun 24-40mm zoom I had many years ago. It was revolutionary, super convenient and very poor.

I guess it depends what you are looking for. If you are a real estate agent needing an adjustable wide angle for interiors and your images are for the web this lens would be fabulous. It focuses very fast and its silent. For a Canon lens its pretty small and light. But make a crisp 8x10 print from an image taken at the 10mm setting? I don't see how.

I know everybody raves about this lens. That's why I bought it. I figured, in all those reviews there had to be somebody who knew what really good image quality was. There were so few negative comments, I figured I'd take a chance. Maybe I got a bad one but when something is this far off the mark I think I'll pass.

GOOD NEWS - I'm delighted (and surprised) to report the Tokina 12-24 lens is really quite good. No, you can't use it wide open and it barrels a bit, but at f/8 its downright sharp, right to the corners(!) I know its not a Canon lens but give it a try. Paint a red ring on it if you have to, but try it.

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Minta fotók

Canon EOS 300D + Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,5 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/7.1
• Gyújtótávolság: 10/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 4,7 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/6.3
• Gyújtótávolság: 10/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 4,2 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/4.5
• Gyújtótávolság: 20/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 4,90 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/6.3
• Gyújtótávolság: 14/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,6 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/6.3
• Gyújtótávolság: 10/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,20 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/11.0
• Gyújtótávolság: 10/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,5 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/9.0
• Gyújtótávolság: 15/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 3,1 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/5.0
• Gyújtótávolság: 13/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,5 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/3.5
• Gyújtótávolság: 12/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,30 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/6.3
• Gyújtótávolság: 10/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 2,20 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/9.0
• Gyújtótávolság: 22/1

• Canon EOS 300D
• Fájlméret: 1,6 MB
• Felbontás: 6,3 megapixel
• Blende: f/13.0
• Gyújtótávolság: 16/1

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Kiegészítők

77 mm Szűrők

77 mm Polár szűrők

• 3 Piece Filter Kit UV, FD, CPL 30.5mm Filters w/ Hard Case for JVC GZMG40, GZMG50, GZMG57, GZMG67, GZMG70, GZMG77, Series 4-7 Camcorders + MORE!!! 7,77 USD
• Zeikos ZE-FLK77 77mm Multi-Coated 3 Piece Filter Kit (UV-CPL-FLD) 5,49 USD
• Panasonic AG-DVX100A - 72mm High Resolution 3-piece Filter Set (UV, Fluorescent, Polarizer) - Black 12,96 USD
• Professional Filter Kit (Polarizer & UV) with Lens Hood for Casio Exilim EX-Z1050, EX-Z77, EX-Z8, and EX-S10 14,95 USD
• Hoya UV Haze Glass Filter For The Samsung GX-20, GX-10, GX-1L, GX-1S Digital SLR Cameras Which Have Any Of These Pentax (21mm, 35mm, 40mm, 43mm, 50mm, 70mm, 77mm, 100mm) Lenses 14,99 USD
• Zeikos ZE-CPL77 77mm Multi-Coated Circular Polarizer Filter 12,24 USD
• SunPak 77MM TWIN PACK CIRCULAR POLARIZER & UV HAZE PROTECTION FILTER 0,00
• Sunpak CP 77mm Circular Polarizer Filter 0,00
• Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ20K FZ20 - 72mm High Resolution 3-piece Filter Set (UV, Fluorescent, Polarizer) - Black 24,95 USD
• Opteka 77mm HD² 3 Piece (UV, PL, FL) Filter Kit for Canon EF 24mm f/1.4, 300mm f/4, 400mm f/5.6, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, 16-35mm f/2.8, & 17-40mm f/4 SLR Lenses 24,95 USD

77 mm UV szűrők

• Opteka 27mm High Definition² UV (0) Ultra Violet Haze Multi-Coated Glass Filter 2,95 USD
• Zeikos ZE-UV77 77mm Multi-Coated UV Filter 2,95 USD
• Nikon - Filter - protection - 77 mm 86,99 USD
• Opteka 30.5mm High Definition² UV (0) Ultra Violet Haze Multi-Coated Glass Filter 4,95 USD
• Tiffen 72mm UV Protection Filter 9,99 USD
• Digital Concepts 77mm U.V. Filter 4,99 USD
• Targus TG-55C 55mm UV and CPL Filter Combo 9,99 USD
• 3 Piece Filter Kit UV, FD, CPL 30.5mm Filters w/ Hard Case for JVC GZMG40, GZMG50, GZMG57, GZMG67, GZMG70, GZMG77, Series 4-7 Camcorders + MORE!!! 7,77 USD
• TIFFEN 67mm-77mm Step Up Filter Ring 7,95 USD
• Zeikos ZE-FLK77 77mm Multi-Coated 3 Piece Filter Kit (UV-CPL-FLD) 5,49 USD

77 mm Skylight szűrők

• Sunpak CF-7012-SK 77mm Skylight Filter 0,00
• Kmart 77mm Skylight Filter
• 77mm (SKY) Skylight Filter 11,49 USD
• Tokina 77mm Skylight 1a AT-X Multi-Coated Filter 18,95 USD
• Promaster 77mm Skylight 1a Filter 24,00 USD
• Tiffen 77WIDSKY 77mm Wide Angle SKY 1-A Filter 0,00
• Quantaray - 77mm Skylight 1A Multi-Coated Filter 29,99 USD
• Hoya 77mm Skylight Multi Coated Glass Filter 44,77 USD
• Hoya SUPER HMC Skylight 1B - Filter - skylight - 77 mm 56,85 USD
• Heliopan 77mm Skylight Filter (KR 1.5) 77,99 USD

77 mm Objektívsapkák

• Zeikos ZE-LC77 77mm Plastic Snap On Lens Cap (Black) 1,76 USD
• Bower 77mm Plastic Lens Cap 2,00 USD
• Kmart 77mm Lens Cap
• Center pinch 77mm snap-on lens cap with keeper 4,95 USD
• Mennon Pro Center Pinch 77mm Snap-On Lens Cap with Leash 5,90 USD
• Mennon Pro Center Pinch 77mm Snap-On Lens Cap with Leash 5,95 USD
• General Brand 77mm White Balance Lens Cap Disk for Digital SLR Cameras 5,99 USD
• Tamron Front Lens Cap 77mm 8,50 USD
• Mamiya RB/RZ Front Lens Cap 77mm #213361 6,95 USD
• B&W 77mm Slip-On Lens Cap For Slim-Line filter with 80mm Ooutside Diameter 6,95 USD