Obrázek velikosti APS-CLenses that create APS-C sized image are designed for digital only. They cannot be used on cameras that have image sensor larger than the APS-C format. These lenses are not suitable for film cameras either. Ultrasonic AFObjektivy s mechanismem zaostření ultrasonic jsou zpravidla tišší a přitom rychlejší než objektivy s běžným systémem zaostření. Je použita jedna nebo více čoček s nízkým rozptylemČočky s nízkým rozptylem redukují chromatickou aberaci. Bez stabilizátoruImage stabilization helps to reduce blur caused by hand shake, especially at high focal length or in low light situations. Image stabilization can give 1 to 3 stop advantage over none stabilized lens, based on the reciprocal rule. Montáž v kovuLevnější objektivy mají zpravidla plastové tělo, zatímco ty dražší, profesionální objektivy mají tělo kovové. Obecně platí, že kovové objektivy déle vydrží a to se vám vrátí především v okamžiku kdy objektivy často měníte. Pokud je kamera převážně používána pouze s jedním objektivem, pak není použitý materiál zas tak důležitý. Integrované zaostřováníObjektivy s integrovaným zaostřováním nemění při ostření svoji velikost. The front lens is fixedThe fixed front lens is not rotating during zoom and/or focusing. This allows the photographer to use petal shaped lens hood. Fixed front lenses also make the use of polarization filters a lot easier. Bez podpory přídavných filtrůPřídavné filtry se používají na těch objektivech, u kterých jsou čelní čočky buď příliš velké, nebo není podporováno použití tradičních filtrů vpředu na objektivu. Tento typ filtrů zpravidla podporují teleobjektivy a objektivy s ultra-širokým úhlem. |
|
| Dostupní výrobci | Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K, Sony / Minolta A, FourThirds, Sigma |
| Aplikace | Krajina, Interiér, Architektura |
| Kategorie | Širokoúhlý zoom |
| Násobič | 1.5× |
| Stabilizátor | ne |
| Délka ohniska | 10 - 20 mm (2× zoom) |
| Konstrukce objektivu | 14 položek v 10 skupinách |
| Úhel záběru |
35mm: N/A digitální: 102.4-63.8° |
| Počet lamel | 6 |
| Maximální clona | široký: f/4 teleobjektiv: f/5,6 |
| Minimální clona | široký: f/22 teleobjektiv: N/A |
| Minimální zaostřovací vzdálenost | 24 cm |
| Zvětšení | 0,15× |
| Rozměr filtru | 77 mm |
| Rozměry | ∅ 83.5 × 81 mm |
| Váha | 470 g |
| Poznámky |
|
| Rychlost AF | 0,5 s (od minima po nekonečno) |
| Zvuk AF | |
| Integrované zaostřování | ano |
| Integrovaný zoom | N/A |
| Připevnění předních čoček | ano |
| Typ montáže | kov |
| Ochrana proti počasí | N/A |
| Přídavný filtr | ne |
| Ultrasonic AF | ano |
| Kruh velikosti APS-C | ano |
| Nízký rozptyl čoček | ano |
| Pevný kryt | N/A |
| Měkký kryt | obsaženo |
| Ochranný kryt objektivů |
LH825-04 (není obsažen) potisk víčka objektivu |
| Adaptér na stativ | N/A |
9. February 2006
there are currently 4 wide angle zoom choices available on the EF-S canon mount (d-rebel/xt/20d) canon 10-22, Sigma 12-24, sigma 10-20, tokina 12-24. Of these, sigma 12-24 is the only one which is usuable on a full frame sensor (canon 1d, 5d, possible future cameras). There is sizable difference in field of view between the 10 mm, and 12 mm. and the tokina is closer to 13 mm on its wide end. The sigma retails for about 2/3 the price of the canon. Optically they are very similar, with the canon having a larger maximum aperature, which is generally not important in a wide angle lens. The built construction is EX, they higher line of sigma, and it excellent. The focus motor is HSM, making it fast, and very accurate. Resolution chart show the sharpness to be very close to that of canon. The color and contrast is excellent, the flare and chromatic abberation genenrally well controlled. A fun lens to use, and excellent value.
23. February 2006
If you are looking good quality and price ultra wide lens for APC-C senser size digital SLR, this lens is a very good choice. Canon also has an EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM lens. However the price is more than $700. Here is a Sigma, 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM. Sure it's little bit dark than Canon, but it's OK. Usally ultra-wide lens are used at outdoor. The photo is very sharp image and you can take a shot without cropping. And minimum focusing distance if 9.4" (24cm), you can make fun photos! Sigma also provice lens hood and carring case for free!
7. April 2007
Fantastic Lens. I received my Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens from Amazon yesterday. I did a lot of research prior to buying this lens. My primary concern was that the lens might be a bit too wide and lead to too much distortion. I was wrong. The lens offers incredible quality from 10mm to 20mm. It's quiet, focuses quickly and feels rock solid. So far, I'm very satisfied.
Canon Digital Rebel XTi 10.1MP Digital SLR
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens
Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM Standard Zoom Lens
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Telephoto Lens
All equipment purchased at Amazon.com
6. January 2006
I replaced my 19-35mm lens with this on my digital rebel and, boy, it's nice to be back into wide angle. For the price, it's a great lens (good build quality and focus-ability). I'm not a lens expert, so I can't really comment on the image quality other than: it's great to me. It comes with a nice lens pouch too (even though I never use them). A couple minor issues: 1) I have the wasia hack and a couple of the settings cause the autofocus and aperture readout to non-function (I thought it was defective until I disabled the hack settings). 2) I wish the distance markings were in smaller increments (not a big deal though, since the autofocus works well). These two things are the only reason that I didn't give it 5 stars.
31. January 2008
I wanted an ultra wide angle lens for my new Canon EOS 40D, but I didn't have the money to purchase a high cost Canon ultra wide lens. Careful research kept pointing to the Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DS HSM lens. At 4 to 5.6, this lens is slightly dark, but for an outdoor lens I figured lighting wouldn't be much of an issue. With a range of 10 to 20mm I decided this lens would offer very wide shots and near fish-eye creativity capabilities.
I always buy only Canon lenses, but I don't buy the professional level models. After all, I am a photo hobbyist, not a professional photographer. Well even though I really wanted to purchase a quality ultra-wide angle lens, I was low on funds due to recently over spending on Christmas gifts for my friends and family. Although I wanted to buy a Canon ultra-wide, I just didn't have that kind of cash. I read several rave reviews on this Sigma 10-20mm lens so I ordered one up. I haven't had it very long but I have taken several photos with this lens and so far I am quite impressed. At 10mm you do get some curved distortions, giving a bit of a fisheye effect. This can be good or bad, depending on what you are looking for in your shot. As another reviewer pointed out, this effect can make clouds look wonderful. This is an EX series Sigma, with a super fast HSM auto focus. The focusing is quick and accurate. The filter size is 77mm, which is HUGE, and filters can be quite expensive, but for what you save on the cost of the lens you can afford to invest in quality UV and polarizer filters. This lens is also fairly light weight and very classy looking. The shiny gold ring is a nice touch indeed. I also really love the fact that this lens comes with a lens hood and a nice padded case.
I only have a couple of minor complaints, neither of which would cause me to reduce my rating. First and most distracting is the fact that the focus and zoom rings are reversed, compaired to the Canon lenses, so I find myself constantly adjusting focus when I mean to adjust zoom. This is something that I will get used to and certainly does not affect the overall quality of the lens. Secondly, with the lens stored in its squarish, padded case, it makes the whole package a bit large and I cannot fit it in my camera bag.
So, with all of this being said I have to give this Sigma EX series 10-20mm lens a solid 5 stars. The optics produce quality photographs, the overall feel of the lens is perfect, and the price is substantially less than the closest Canon equivalent. 5 stars may seem a bit high to some people, who feel that only the most perfect, professional lenses deserve this high of a score. But I feel that the quality and performance of this lens merrits a perfect score. For the average consumer photographer there just isn't a better ultra-wide lens on the market today. It even scores better than the Canon ultra-wides! I couldn't be happier with my new Sigma EX 10-20mm, and I highly recommend it to anyone looking for an excellent ultra-wide lens.
21. October 2006
I went into a local camera store to look at the Nikon 12-24mm wide angle zoom to eventually augment the Nikon 50mm 1.8 and 18-200mm VR I currently use on my D200. After seeing the Sigma 10-20mm, taking test shots with it and the Nikon, and then printing the shots in the store, I walked out with the Sigma lens.
I had planned to buy the 12-24mm Nikon next Spring when my budget would allow the expenditure. I have had success with Nikon optics in the past - starting with my first Nikon FM back in the seventies. The Sigma's good construction, nice finish, smooth+fast+quiet focusing and 10mm focal length convinced me to try my first non-Nikon lens in 30 years. A big factor: The Sigma lens is less than half the price of the Nikon lens here is Canada. It fit my budget, so I took the plunge.
The Sigma fits into my "sharp enough" category. In real world shooting, its sharpness is on par with my 18-200mm Nikon. Both lens are less sharp than my $100 50mm 1.8 when "test" images are blown up to 16"x20" size. I never notice any lack of sharpness in "real" pictures. I care more about color saturation, contrast and color balance anyway. In this area, the Sigma does well. Saturation and contrast are equal to both my other Nikon lens - particularly at f8 and smaller aperatures. Wide open, I find some weakening in contrast. The Sigma has a warmer color termperature than my other lens. One click toward blue in Photoshop would fix this minor variance in color. But I use my 10-20mm almost exclusively for landscapes. The warmer color is generally a good thing.
I have noticed some vignetting @ 10mm f4. Zooming to 12mm or stopping down to f5.6 elminates any artifacts in pictures I have taken thus far. I have found it's more important to avoid "thick framed" filters - and stacking filters is a no no with this lens. They cause more darkening than a wide open f-stop. BTW: I added a 72 to 77mm step-up ring to my 18-200m VR Nikon to allow me to share filters between my zoom lens.
I do miss having a manual/autofocus switch on the Sigma lens. I have accidently nudged the manual focus ring a couple of times. With that said, the incredible depth of field of this lens (or any lens at this focal length) means small focusing errors can be tolerated :)
I recommend this lens - even to people like me, who never had a non-nikon lens before.
1. July 2006
Having purchased both the Nikon 12+ and the Sigma 10+ before returning the Nikkor and keeping this Sigma, I can honestly say that I can not be happier with this lens. The photos are super sharp, the lens works perfectly, it feels good on my D200, and it has become the only other lens I carry along with my 18-200 VR. I can't recommend this lens more.
12. November 2005
A very high quality superwide lens that operates perfectly with my D70. If indoor or landscape photography are your passions, then this is the gem to get ! Focus is completely sharp anywhere between 10-20mm and the best thing about it......it's priced sooooo right !!!!! Try it, you'll love it !
14. August 2006
I have been shooting for about eight months now. i was torn between the sigma and the nikon. I read several reviews and wnet to a camera store and tested both lens and enlarged them in photoshop. I love the sigma. It is wider, less CA and seems like less barrell. It is as sharp as the nikon, the only downside is that there is light fall off when the lens is wide open at 10mm. It is very noticable, so i just stop down to 7.1 or 8 and the problem is fixed. The sharpness is clear through the whole picture. For the price it can not be beat. I would rate this lens equal with the nikon 12-24. I see no advantage to going with the nikon over the sigma unless you like the constant 4 and minor light fall off when wide open, easily fixable.
18. August 2005
This lens was something that I was not going to buy. I tried it out and found that the range was incredible and the quality was what you expect from Sigma. It was worth it for me!!! Worked perfect on my D70!!!
17. March 2008
My first impression when I received a package with this lens was "Wow!".
This lens is very well built and it comes with a dedicated case.
There was an extended warranty from Sigma included with the lens in addition to the standard one. If I remember well, it was 4 or 5 years in total. Very good, Sigma!
The Sigma 10-20 mm f/4-5.6 EX lens for Pentax mount looks different from the picture on Amazon. It does not have the window for scale, instead the last one is just painted on the barrel. And certainly it is not HSM, but a "screwdriver" type.
It mounts and locks on my *istDs and K10D easily. Surprisingly, I still can rotate the lens in the mount (in locked position) to a small but noticeable degree. It seems that the lock mechanism on this lens has "extended" tolerance and/or the mount coupling lens-body is not tight enough. This is a bit annoying. The zoom barrel is stiff in operation, so it happens to me to push it a bit harder and so turn the lens in the mount.
Now a few words about the optical quality of this lens.
I read many reports stating that their copy of the lens was good, as well as the ones stating the opposite.
Although my copy of this lens is not as sharp as my prime lenses (which was expected), it is good. But there is one "BUT".
My lens is sharp provided it is focused correctly. This is something difficult to achieve in certain situations and especially at wider angles. With this lens the AF tends to lock elsewhere, but not on the subject. And often there is no consistency - even if I focus several times on the same subject which is 3 meters away, the AF may lock anywhere from 1 m to infinity.
I am not sure if this is the lens or the camera AF system which causes such behaviour. In most cases I just set the distance manually and rely on the DOF.
5. July 2008
I've had this lens for four months now. I wanted to get a good feel for it before I signed off on it.
I have been completely impressed with this lens on my K10D. At 10mm, the lens is super wide, but doesn't distort images like a fisheye lens would, unless you get very close to your subject. At 20mm, there is very little noticeable distortion.
This lens is extremely sharp when shooting with a medium aperture, much sharper than I would have hoped for.
Overall, this is an incredible lens, and well worth the money.
26. July 2008
I've only had this lens for about 24 hours, and it's already one of my favorites.
The build on this lens is magnificent. It feels very sturdy, and has a beautiful matte black finish that looks very sharp and professional. It includes a lens hood and padded cloth case, both of which are of a similarly high quality. (I'll add pictures of the lens, hood, and case later on.)
The angle of view from this lens is breathtaking. Just from the few test shots I've done in my apartment I'm astounded at how much of the space this lens is able to capture, with almost no distortion at all. Most lenses with this wide an angle would show significant fish-eye distortion, but this lens does a virtually flawless job of correcting those distortions and providing sharp, accurate images with a wide field of view.
I did a lot of comparison shopping before deciding on the Sigma 10-20, and this lens is everything I had hoped for and more.
If you're interested in getting an ultra-wide-angle lens on a budget you will not be disappointed with this one.
23. November 2008
I like the lens--it significantly extends the range of my camera. The distortion, particularly below 12mm is significant. It's quite a large lens. I recommend you ensure your bag can handle it. I recommend you get a UV filter if just for the physical protection it affords to the large, bulging outer lens. Overall build and performance is good, but I think it's a bit expensive for what you get.
2. June 2008
Just perfect, wonderful pictures at an affordable price. the distortion is a real very minimal. I also have the PENTAX Fish-eye objectief smc DA 10-17mm f/3,5-4,5ED (IF), but that is pure for fun.
7. October 2007
Excellent build quality. Lens has a very "heavy" feel to it and performs excellent. The included lens hood also works well.
I am very impressed with the quality of the images and the close up photography in macro mode is also excellent.
4. June 2008
Excellent, no visible barrel distortion. The only drawback is relatively high f-stop, so low-light shots are tricky to do.
6. August 2008
Got my lens a few days ago, and sorry to say I was a bit disappointed. First of all, the picture and description of the lens I ordered (for my Sony A-700) was inaccurate. There is NO HSM on this lens for the Sony, tho the picture would show otherwise. No auto and manual switch either. But the thing that really disappointed me was that I tried it at all apertures, and it just wasn't that sharp. I have other Sigma WA zooms that are much sharper and cost less than this one. As far as the build goes, I have no problem with that or the weight of the lens. It's a solid, well-built lens...unfortunately, I didn't purchase it for those reasons. It just doesn't perform the way I expected it to. Maybe I just got a dud. I don't know.
8. April 2008
When i recieved this lens i was half disapoined because is wasnt with the (HSM) option , and it doesnt the same on that shown on the photo , i dont know whos fault it was ? when i read the discreption on the amazon it tells that this lens is with ( HSM ) option , and i send an e-mail to the amazon and i told them about the problem that this product i recieved is less option than the one i ordered , and they ask me to send it back , but since i already have it between my hands i decided to keep it , there is not too much differant between the one with the (HSM) option and the one i recieved , the ( HSM ) lens work without noise , but the one i recieved make a littel noise .
1. September 2008
This lens is very sharp and reasonably light. The reason why I chose this lens is because it probably is the smallest among the wide angles out there. No, it is not an "HSM" lens for Minolta and Sony. But for this price it is unbeatable ! I've used it on my cruise to Vancouver and Alaska and hardly taken a bad shot with it. If you're into wide angles and price is, or is not a concern, it really doesn't matter, this lens performs with the best of them out there. As with any wide angle lens, barrel distortion is noticable but at 15mm, what can you expect. Knowing that you can shoot more creatively and out to 30mm group shots are very nice and convenient. I've had several wide angle lens previouly and this lens is also a winner!
2. April 2007
Well, I really liked the Tamron wide angle lens which offered a zoom range that invited it to be the > one < lens you keep on your camera. With few exceptions, digital cameras self zoom a bit. So all lenses are more close up than their lens ratings would lead you to believe.
To go wide angle, in digital, you have to go very wide. But very wide angle lenses bring in some flaky things in color, dark corners, glare rings, and things to make nearly excellent shots just nice.. but .....mmmmmm
The ZOOM wide angle lenses magnify the weird stuff. So high quality wide angle usually means NOT zoom. The Tamron entry seemed to go wide enough that the SLR had that one all purpose lens which the film SLRs enjoy.
This is not that lens. The is - for digital - a really wide angle lens. The 10mm is crazy wide - in a zoom? But it works. Used outside, or in the right circumstances inside, is excellent. It is not the ONE lens for your SLR, unless you really don't like ever getting close up.
I have this Russian made super crazy wide fixed focal length lens (nearly 180 degrees) which with adapter fits nearly anything. It is good at that very rare crazy wide shot. But this Sigma lens has all the auto features and graceful adaptation to being outdoors - where how wide varies with what direction. Nice image quality with low distortion.
It is a great second lens.
20. January 2008
Used on my 40D and it is great. Came with a center pinch cover and hood. Quality is good and works great.
Good product and Amazon is a great seller.
b